Skip to content

Test: Artifacts Lint workflow (do not merge) - #4

Closed
hdamker wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci/artifacts-lint
Closed

Test: Artifacts Lint workflow (do not merge)#4
hdamker wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
ci/artifacts-lint

Conversation

@hdamker

@hdamker hdamker commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Test run of the new Artifacts Lint workflow ahead of the upstream PR — do not merge.

Verifies on the pull_request path: all three checks (yamllint, Spectral, gplint) green at error level, warning annotations rendering, and the tooling v1-rc sparse checkout + npm ci setup.

hdamker added 2 commits July 16, 2026 12:14
Kebab-case webhook path and a syntactically valid externalDocs.url
placeholder resolve the two error-level Spectral findings; the
issue-template trailing space resolves the yamllint finding.
Rule-compliant placeholders instead of suppression rules, per the
first-step scope on camaraproject#668. The externalDocs.url placeholder is
harmonized to APIRepositoryName (PascalCase, like real repository
names) across all three API templates.
Lint configurations and tool versions come from camaraproject/tooling
at the v1-rc pin API repositories use for CAMARA Validation. All three
checks gate at error level; first step on camaraproject#668.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant