Skip to content

Skat - #64

Open
hsmajlovic wants to merge 3 commits into
devfrom
skat
Open

Skat#64
hsmajlovic wants to merge 3 commits into
devfrom
skat

Conversation

@hsmajlovic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Comment thread sfkit/auth/setup_networking.py Fixed
@dinvlad
dinvlad changed the base branch from prod to dev September 10, 2026 23:58
@dinvlad

dinvlad commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@hsmajlovic I noticed that the PR was indicated to be merged into prod so it picked up a lot of unrelated changes from dev. I just went ahead and changed it to be merged into dev first, which after merging the PR we can merge dev to prod. I'll review the PR in a bit.

@dinvlad dinvlad left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems good, just a few minor comments.

Did you have a chance to test this code in dev yet, or do we need to merge the PRs first for that?

If it's the latter, I recommend merging sfkit-website and sfkit-react PRs first, and then you can test this sfkit CLI code without merging this PR first, to ensure it all works OK together with the real dev backend/frontend. Please let me know if you need help with that.

Comment thread Dockerfile Outdated
Comment on lines +225 to +229
config_path = os.path.join(constants.SFKIT_DIR, "skat_config.toml")
with open(config_path, "w") as f:
f.write(tomlkit.dumps(data))

return config_path

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Usually we have both configGlobal.toml for global params (that apply to all parties) and configLocal.Party{role}.toml for params specific to a given party.

I notice that https://github.com/swanhong/secure-skat seems to be using the same format (+ configPrepare.toml). Of course, just make sure it still works even with unified config format from above.

Comment on lines +263 to +264
if role == "1":
process_output_files(role)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to make sure, only role 1 needs processing output files?

Comment thread Dockerfile Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants