ci(mergify): upgrade configuration to current format#10978
ci(mergify): upgrade configuration to current format#10978mergify[bot] merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
|
I knew it. |
|
To: support@mergify.com I'm a member of the Cabal support team. Your bot keeps complaining about our config, but ignoring most of it when "fixing" it. We just received a third "here, I'vve fixed your queue rules" PR that for the third time ignored one of our rules and broke the other. Is there a way to make it happy while keeping our configuration? Configuration: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/blob/master/.github/mergify.yml The "fix" ignores the squash-merge queue and continually raises the priority of the default queue over the priority of the direct-to-release-branch rule, which is deliberately higher than the default. |
|
@geekosaur did you send the above message somewhere or is it a draft for comments? |
|
I sent it, we had a few rounds, the conclusion was that we should just let it sit and they're submitting an internal ticket (but I expect that won't go anywhere since the cutoff will pass first). |
|
|
Great, thank you! Let it sit was my proposal as well. |
0bfe03a to
1e49754
Compare
|
Of course they just reverted my attempt to keep it from breaking our setup… |
1e49754 to
b748a11
Compare
|
Still no indication that this (a) does anything but break our priorities (b) is going to be fixed. I won't be surprised if another one gets opened within an hour or so that still breaks things to no point. |
3b1afe1 to
b748a11
Compare
|
Oh, it seems to have one actual change that looks valid now. And isn't breaking priorities any more. |
Merge Queue Status
This pull request spent 1 hour 52 minutes 11 seconds in the queue, including 1 hour 40 minutes 43 seconds running CI. Required conditions to merge
|
|
@geekosaur why did we merge this? I thought it only breaks things for us... |
No more deprecated fields are being used in your Mergify configuration, this pull request will be closed.