A modular toolkit for Responsible AI auditing and LLM context optimization.
This project explores methods to improve machine learning reliability, fairness, and efficiency by combining:
- Responsible AI auditing
- Data leakage detection
- LLM token/context optimization
- Model evaluation visualization
The goal is to create practical tool that students can integrate into ML pipelines.
In many machine learning workflows, model development focuses heavily on accuracy. However, several important risks are often overlooked.
Bias and Fairness: Models can perform differently across demographic groups. Without proper auditing, these disparities may go unnoticed until they cause harm.
Data Leakage: Models can achieve artificially high performance by accidentally learning information that would not be available at prediction time, leading to failures in production.
LLM Context Inefficiency: (Riddick Input)
| Module | Goal |
|---|---|
| Responsible AI Auditing | Evaluate model performance across demographic subgroups and compute fairness metrics |
| Data Leakage Detection | Identify potential leakage risks in datasets and ML pipelines |
| LLM Context Optimization | (Riddick Input) |
| Visualization Dashboard | Provide interactive visual summaries of all module outputs |
ml_reliability_efficiency_toolkit/
│
├── modules/
│ ├── fairness/ ← fairness audit module
│ │ └── README.md ← metrics, thresholds, evaluation criteria
│ │
│ ├── leakage/ ← leakage detection module
│ │ └── README.md ← detection methods, risk levels, evaluation criteria
│ │
│ └── token/ ← LLM context optimizer module
│ └── README.md ← benchmarks, success criteria, evaluation criteria
│
├── dashboard/ ← Streamlit app
├── data/ ← raw and processed datasets
├── docs/ ← concept explanations and architecture docs
├── evaluation/ ← shared evaluation utilities
├── notebooks/ ← demo notebooks per module
├── reports/ ← experiment outputs and result summaries
├── requirements.txt
├── .gitignore
└── README.md ← this file
Each module follows a consistent evaluation approach:
- Define formal metrics
- Apply thresholds for interpretation
- Generate structured outputs
- Integrate results into a unified dashboard
This ensures that results are comparable across modules, interpretable, and actionable.
| Layer | Libraries |
|---|---|
| Base | pandas, numpy, scikit-learn |
| Fairness Audit | fairlearn, aif360 |
| Leakage Detection | pandas, scikit-learn, great-expectations, scipy |
| LLM Context Optimizer | Riddick Input |
| Dashboard | streamlit, plotly, matplotlib |
Adult Income Dataset (UCI ML Repository): Predicts whether an individual earns more than $50,000/year. Attributes include age, education, occupation, marital status, race, and gender. Used for fairness auditing and subgroup analysis.
German Credit Dataset: Predicts whether an individual represents a good or bad credit risk. Attributes include age, gender, employment status, credit history, and loan amount. Used for fairness evaluation in financial decision systems.
Synthetic Leakage Dataset: Generated to simulate controlled leakage scenarios including a feature directly encoding the target, future information in training data, and train/test duplication. Used for testing and validating the leakage detection module.
(Riddick Input)
Evaluates model behavior across demographic groups.
- Computes fairness metrics (e.g., equal opportunity difference, demographic parity ratio)
- Performs subgroup performance analysis
- Flags disparities using defined thresholds
For metric definitions, thresholds, and evaluation criteria, see
fairness_audit/README.md.
Identifies potential sources of leakage in datasets and ML pipelines.
- Detects features strongly correlated with the target
- Identifies train/test contamination
- Highlights high-risk features
For detection methods, risk levels, and evaluation criteria, see
leakage_detection/README.md.
Riddick Input
Interactive Streamlit application that displays:
- Fairness metrics and subgroup comparisons
- Leakage risk reports
- LLM experiment results
| Week | Focus | Key Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Setup & Architecture | Kickoff meeting, GitHub repo, folder structure, module ownership assigned, environment setup confirmed |
| 2 | Research & Exploration | Library review, module approach designs, key concepts documented in /docs |
| 3 | Prototype — Part 1 (all modules) | Each module: data loading working, core logic scaffolded, basic output produced — fairness metrics, leakage checks, token importance |
| 4 | Prototype — Part 2 (all modules) | Each module: full pipeline working, evaluation criteria implemented, demo notebook complete and runnable |
| 5 | Module Improvement | Refined fairness metrics, improved leakage logic, token experiment tuning |
| 6 | System Integration & Experiments | Modules connected to dashboard, shared utilities, full experiment runs and results documented |
| 7 | Documentation & Polish | Final docs, clean repo structure, dashboard polish |
| 8 | Final Presentation | Slides, demo, architecture summary, findings |
Project developed as part of the GRIDS.
- Work within your assigned module folder
- Document experiments in the
notebooks/folder - Add explanations and references in the
docs/folder - Use GitHub issues to track tasks and progress
For research and educational use.