[fubin1999]

Summary

Strictly reject unmatched StrucGP markers and malformed content. The maintainer chose strict validation in the review page; the old permissive A1B1a expectation is removed and explicitly tested as invalid.

Includes #59 strict pGlyco validation to allow ordered merging (#59 first). Both NEWS entries and tests are retained.

Validation

• Full local testthat suite passes on macOS / R 4.6.1 after integrating fix: reject unclosed pGlyco branches #59.
• Covers explicit parsing, auto_parse, names, missing values and valid structures.
• Canonical output comparison avoids comparing unrelated cached igraph pointers.
• Updated-head CI and fresh Codex review pending.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 16 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	16
Duplication	0

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[fubin1999]

Further audit found an explicit compatibility regression in tests/testthat/test-native.R (native ports preserve established tokenization and recovery) that currently expects A1B1a to parse successfully. That makes strict marker validation a compatibility/API decision rather than an unambiguous bug fix. This draft is paused; I will not change that existing test merely to make CI pass or request automated review until the intended policy is decided.

[fubin1999]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-06T09:26:41.894571Z	ecbd974	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: ecbd974db6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".