Skip to content

Feature Request: Support for additional applications and platforms for traffic interception #35

Open

Description

@xhzeem

Current supported interception methods

Based on the current UI, the following interception methods are available:

Core Methods (No Installation Required):

  • Google Chrome
  • Terminal

Manual Configuration Required:

  • Mozilla Firefox
  • Manual (custom proxy configuration)
Image

Requested additional support

I'd like to request support for additional applications and platforms that are not currently covered. This would greatly enhance the utility of the tool for a wider range of development and testing scenarios.

Suggested additions:

Enhanced Browser Support:

  • Brave
  • Edge
  • Safari (macOS)
  • Opera
  • Arc Browser
  • Vivaldi
  • Other Chromium-based browsers

Development Environments:

  • Docker Containers
  • JVM processes (Java, Kotlin, Clojure)
  • Electron Applications
  • Node.js processes
  • Python applications
  • .NET applications
  • Go applications
  • Ruby applications
  • PHP applications

Mobile Platforms:

  • Android Device via QR code
  • Android App via Frida
  • iOS via Manual Setup
  • iOS App via Frida
  • Automatic iOS Device Setup

Virtualization & Network:

  • VirtualBox VMs
  • VMware VMs
  • Network-wide interception
  • A Device on Your Network
  • Everything (intercept all HTTP traffic on machine)

Desktop Applications:

  • Native macOS applications
  • Windows applications
  • Linux applications
  • Communication apps (Slack, Discord, Teams)
  • Development tools (IDE integrations)

Use cases

Adding support for these additional platforms would enable:

  • Mobile app developers to test native app behavior more thoroughly
  • Web developers to test across all major browsers
  • Desktop application developers to debug network communications
  • Network administrators to monitor traffic across entire networks
  • Security researchers to analyze traffic from various sources

Implementation considerations

Some of these may require:

  • Platform-specific hooks and APIs
  • Certificate installation procedures
  • Permission handling
  • Performance optimizations for high-traffic scenarios

Would it be possible to prioritize some of these based on community demand or technical feasibility? Any updates on the development roadmap for expanding platform support would be greatly appreciated.

Bellow are some screenshots of HTTP Toolkit for ref:
Image

Image

Activity

  1. BehiSecc commented on Mar 10, 2026

    @BehiSecc

    This is a trap. You don’t really need to add support for browsers like Brave or Opera. No one uses them, at least not for bug hunting or web security.

  2. glitchedgitz commented on Mar 10, 2026

    @glitchedgitz
    Owner

    Maybe not other browsers but intercepting android, ios, electron app or emulators would be quite handy. But definetly not embedding the emulators in the main app, more of a seperate binary/plugin kinda system.
    @BehiSecc @xhzeem

  3. glitchedgitz commented on Mar 10, 2026

    @glitchedgitz
    Owner
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions