Skip to content

docs: sync shared issue-management block to v7 - #9

Merged
rabestro merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/issue-management-v7
Sep 6, 2026
Merged

docs: sync shared issue-management block to v7#9
rabestro merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/issue-management-v7

Conversation

@rabestro

@rabestro rabestro commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Byte-identical copy of the canonical dc-shared:issue-management v7 block from fortemate/.github (AGENTS.md), applied with the agents-shared-blocks skill. No other change.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated issue management guidance with more concise workflow instructions.
    • Added references to dedicated issue workflow and delegation guidance.
    • Standardized branch naming conventions and technical-domain labeling requirements.
    • Clarified that jules is an execution trigger rather than an assignable label.
    • Added repository-readiness requirements before the first delegation.
    • Standardized issue creation requirements, including context, objectives, and testable completion criteria.

Byte-identical copy of the canonical block in fortemate/.github (AGENTS.md).
Applied with the agents-shared-blocks skill; no other change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 58629897-4c36-4196-96af-9d7d97c2b72b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6999ca9 and b523645.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • AGENTS.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

AGENTS.md replaces the issue-management v6 guidance with v7. It updates branch naming, issue creation, label rules, and Jules dispatch rules. It delegates detailed triage and dispatch procedures to skills.

Changes

Issue management guidance

Layer / File(s) Summary
Condense issue-management workflow rules
AGENTS.md
The guidance now restricts branch types, requires structured issue creation through gh issue create --body-file, limits labels to existing technical domains, and treats jules as a live execution trigger. Detailed project, relationship, priority, and read-back rules now rely on referenced skills.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to b5236

This change updates the shared issue-management guidance without an established merge-blocking risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the documented change: syncing the shared issue-management block to version 7.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/issue-management-v7

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@rabestro
rabestro merged commit 12513d5 into main Sep 6, 2026
12 checks passed
@rabestro
rabestro deleted the docs/issue-management-v7 branch September 6, 2026 03:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant