Development - #14
Development#14
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 35d1a5906d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| observed_at, | ||
| ) | ||
| .map_err(|_| request_failure(&request, CollectorFailureCode::Internal))?; | ||
| let rejections = partial_rejections(stats); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Scope OpenCode rejections to mapped records
When a daily refresh uses an incremental scope, this turns global reconciliation stats from every OpenCode session into rejections before map_daily filters records to the requested date range. If an old out-of-scope session has a deferred live row or counter regression, today's otherwise clean daily import is marked partial; if there are no in-scope candidates, CollectionResult::daily rejects the result as AllRecordsRejected, failing the refresh. Please derive the daily rejections from the records that survive the daily scope filter, or suppress out-of-scope session stats for scoped daily requests.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Release\n\nPrepare Burnly v0.1.28.\n\n- unified native OpenCode/OpenCode 2 collector with compatibility rebuild and compaction-safe recovery\n- Antigravity timestamp-less CLI usage recovery\n- reviewed v0.1.28 release notes and version metadata\n\n## Verification\n\n- pnpm verify\n- pnpm verify:runtime\n- release version, workflow, packaging, artifact, and updater metadata checks\n- development push CI: https://github.com/fikrilal/burnly/actions/runs/32615600840