EN-PARITY-W1-MBTI-COMPARISON-W9-QA-01: independently QA all 7 English comparison assets

[fermatmind]

What changed

• records a fresh independent W9 review for all 7 English MBTI comparison assets
• binds the PASS verdict to exact package SHA deecc8175fb43ba3730d6513b496a0ab6834459108e3b24e25550bbf40e001a2
• records per-row source/content/safety/page-alignment evidence and immutable QA file hashes
• registers the exact PR-train manifest/state scope

Why

The W1 comparison package requires independent W9 evidence before any exact-package control transition or draft import can be considered. The review was rerun after the isolated frontend detailed-renderer repair merged.

Validation

• exact package aggregate and 5/5 file hashes: PASS
• independent 7/7 full-body review and all aggregate checks: PASS
• backend focused package/dry-run suites: 12 tests / 1235 assertions PASS
• frontend comparison contract: 7/7 PASS
• exact-package renderer shape and duplicate-projection validation: 7/7 PASS
• current control validator: PASS
• synthetic package_frozen exact-report validator: PASS
• exact-SHA qa_pass candidate focused contract: PASS
• W9 four-file JSON/SHA validation: PASS
• control master focused contract: 62/62 PASS
• YAML/JSON parse, diff and exact six-file scope: PASS

Intentionally deferred

• control-master package_frozen/qa_pass transition remains a separate CONTROL scope
• no package mutation, CMS/staging/production import, publication, activation, sitemap, llms, indexability, search submission, or deployment
• old BLOCKED W9 reports are intentionally excluded

Repository rule impact

No content ownership or runtime authority change. This PR records independent exact-package gate evidence only; backend CMS/public APIs remain authoritative and every write/release permission remains false.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.