EN-PARITY-W2-BIG5-RESULT-ASSETS-01: produce reviewed Big Five English result assets - #3451
Conversation
|
@codex review |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 93c8269644
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bf7bf368fa
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5253de1d37
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4798999c49
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f72ca15084
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 675e96810e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cf28114bff
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 65b8cd1f09
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
@codex review |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
@codex review |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
1 participant
What changed\n- added a deterministic backend English draft package covering the exact 16 frozen Big Five result/report/share/PDF/history inventory units\n- added 5 dimension and 30 facet explanations, value-neutral range copy, reflection, workplace/relationship, entitlement, CTA, failure-state, mobile/desktop, private PDF/history, share-safe, and analytics reader-label groups\n- added package lineage, exact 118-row reconciliation, all-30 facet semantic anchors, required-key coverage, duplicate, claim-boundary, self-review, SHA, durable report, validator, and focused contract evidence\n- added an exact runtime-freeze classifier exception for this draft-only package path with positive and negative regression coverage\n\n## Why\nPR 1866 froze W2 inventory at 16 result-content identities. This PR supplies backend-authoritative English reader assets without creating frontend fallback authority or changing runtime selection.\n\n## Validation\n- PHP syntax: package validator and focused tests PASS\n- package validator: 16/16, deterministic SHA aea87a8c0545d1be6cb1a32ff981576d62d077a8eab36834f34ec9d41c1bfc81 PASS twice byte-identically\n- focused package PHPUnit: 7 tests / 517 assertions PASS\n- runtime-freeze focused regression: PASS\n- composer test:content: 4 tests / 62 assertions PASS\n- scoped Pint PASS\n- JSON/JSONL/YAML parsing, CJK/private-field/public-URL/forbidden-claim/fixed-type scans, SHA recomputation, diff and exact 17-path scope checks PASS\n\n## Deferred items\n- human editorial review\n- W9 independent QA\n- any package freeze, importer/selector/runtime integration, CMS/database write, publication, indexability/search action, or deployment\n\n## Repository rule impact\nDraft-only backend content package. Existing backend authority, zh-CN registry, runtime selector, importer, schema, public APIs, and frontend no-fallback rules remain unchanged.\n\n\n\n\n\n