Generalize the partial-product convergence converse - #4
Open
faabian wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
PowerSeries.Multipliablein the general finitely-determined sensethm.fps.lim.prod-lim-convProof idea
For coefficient degree
n, choose an initial segment after which every partial product isx^n-equivalent to the limit. Comparing the partial products immediately before and after any later factor shows that this initial product absorbs that factor modulox^(n+1). Induction over an arbitrary finite set of later factors then proves that the initial segment determines coefficientn. This works over an arbitrary commutative ring and does not require cancellation, units, or normalized constant coefficients.Validation
lake build AlgebraicCombinatorics.FPS.InfiniteProductslake build(8,078 jobs; succeeds)#print axiomsfor both new public theorems reports onlypropext,Classical.choice, andQuot.soundThe pre-existing project-wide
sorrywarnings in unrelated LGV, Jacobi–Trudi, and Desnanot–Jacobi declarations are unchanged.