Removed v0.0.3b from docs#641
Conversation
…here - Revised project description to emphasize Exosphere as a runtime for AI agents and workflows. - Enhanced sections on reliability, developer experience, and production readiness. - Added details on autonomous execution and scalable agent lifecycles. - Removed outdated examples and streamlined content for clarity.
- Expanded the "Plug-and-Play Nodes" section to highlight the new marketplace for community-contributed tools. - Added a new section detailing the release cycle and roadmap, including monthly releases and issue labeling for better project tracking.
…start section - Unified agent/workflow runtime description for clarity and conciseness - Enhanced feature bullet points for reliability, developer experience, and infrastructure sections - Added clear quick-start sample for faster onboarding - Improved badge organization and external resource links - Applied minor copy editing, structure, and layout alignment across readme variants
- Updated the project description to emphasize Exosphere as a reliability runtime for AI agents. - Reorganized feature sections into a table format for better readability and accessibility. - Enhanced the "Why Exosphere?" section to highlight key capabilities and benefits. - Added a new image asset to illustrate functionality. - Improved navigation structure in documentation and added new markdown extensions for better formatting. - Streamlined content across various sections for consistency and clarity.
- Updated the project title from "Reliablity" to "Reliability" to ensure accurate representation of Exosphere's purpose as a runtime for AI agents.
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings. WalkthroughThe pull request removes all beta-related guidance and notices from documentation files, including beta version setup instructions, status warnings, and inline beta references across Docker Compose setup and Exosphere feature documentation. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @NiveditJain, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on a comprehensive update and refinement of the project's documentation, particularly the main Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully removes all references to the beta version v0.0.3b from the documentation, which aligns with the PR's goal. It also includes a significant and well-executed refactoring of the main README.md and the documentation's index page, introducing a cleaner, more structured layout with new CSS. My review includes a couple of suggestions to further improve the user experience for new developers and enhance the maintainability of the documentation's styling.
I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.
README.md (39-46)
The new README is much cleaner and more structured. However, by removing the 'Quick Start' and 'Getting Started' sections with code examples (especially the docker-compose one), we might be making it harder for new users to quickly try out Exosphere. A concise quick start guide on the main README is a very effective way to engage developers.
Consider re-adding a minimal 'Quick Start' section that shows how to get Exosphere running in a couple of commands. The previous docker-compose example was great for this.
docs/docs/index.md (1-3)
For better maintainability and separation of concerns, it's recommended to avoid inline styles and legacy HTML attributes like align="center". You can move this styling to extra.css using classes. This keeps your content clean and centralizes styling rules.
Suggestion:
First, apply the code suggestion below to this file.
Then, add the corresponding styles to docs/docs/stylesheets/extra.css:
.logo-container {
text-align: center;
}
.logo-main {
max-width: 50%;
}<p class="logo-container">
<img src="assets/logo-with-bg.png" alt="exosphere logo" class="logo-main">
</p>
No description provided.