refactor(spec-specs): rename inclusion_list_satisfied field

[jihoonsong]

🗒️ Description

This PR renames is_inclusion_list_satisfied to inclusion_list_satisfied according to the latest engine APIs change.

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

ethereum/execution-apis#609

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast static checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Verifying Changes:

  just static

• All: PR title have the form <type>(<area>):, where <type> and <area> come from an approrpriate C-<type>, respectively A-<area>, label. The title should match the a target squash commit message.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).
• Tests: For PRs implementing a missed test case, update the post-mortem document to add an entry the list.
• Ported Tests: Add the following docstring to manually enhanced tests from ./tests/ported_static/:

  @manually-enhanced: Do not overwrite. Post-state expectations corrected
  manually (see PR #2784).
  

Cute Animal Picture

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (eips/bogota/eip-7805@0b85a96). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/ethereum/forks/amsterdam/fork.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##             eips/bogota/eip-7805    #3092   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                        ?   84.33%           
=======================================================
  Files                           ?      535           
  Lines                           ?    32913           
  Branches                        ?     3025           
=======================================================
  Hits                            ?    27756           
  Misses                          ?     4682           
  Partials                        ?      475           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	84.33% <50.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[spencer-tb]

LGTM! Thx