feat(execute): report individual test results in hive UI

[spencer-tb]

🗒️ Description

Add per-test Hive test records so each execute test appears individually in hiveview with its own pass/fail status, instead of aggregating all results into a single entry.

Reproduce

1. Start hive in dev mode:

./hive --dev --client go-ethereum

2. Run execute hive without this PR (single aggregated result):

export HIVE_SIMULATOR=http://127.0.0.1:3000
uv run execute hive -m transaction_test --fork Osaka -k "test_empty_authorization_list or test_invalid_auth_signature" -s

Hiveview shows 1 entry: "Base Hive Test", all tests aggregated into a single pass/fail.

3. Run execute hive with this PR (individual results):

export HIVE_SIMULATOR=http://127.0.0.1:3000
uv run execute hive -m transaction_test --fork Osaka -k "test_empty_authorization_list or test_invalid_auth_signature" -s

Hiveview shows 10 entries: 1 "Client Deployment" + 9 individual test cases, each with their own pass/fail status.

4. View results:

./hiveview --serve --logdir workspace/logs

Open http://localhost:8080

Note: hiveview in dev mode requires ethereum/hive#1400 to display results.

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

Closes #1550

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  uvx tox -e static

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.97%. Comparing base (68fae57) to head (aa28d01).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on forks/amsterdam.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           forks/amsterdam    #2446   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            85.97%   85.97%           
================================================
  Files                  599      599           
  Lines                36916    36916           
  Branches              3771     3771           
================================================
  Hits                 31738    31738           
  Misses                4560     4560           
  Partials               618      618           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	85.97% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[danceratopz]

This does a duplication of the troublesome (#1534) and ugly code from pytest_hive:
https://github.com/spencer-tb/execution-specs/blob/aa28d01577c94c1802d2ff7c8a03070485da6e42/packages/testing/src/execution_testing/cli/pytest_commands/plugins/pytest_hive/pytest_hive.py#L250-L373

We should strive to keep this single source, or as much as possible.

I'm not sure whether using a multi-test client is overkill here, cf https://github.com/danceratopz/execution-specs/blob/82a06a33e8a52059064241a14a589bcb7a0a25e8/packages/testing/src/execution_testing/cli/pytest_commands/plugins/consume/simulators/multi_test_client.py, but I think we should align it for improved log reporting, we're so close! See ethereum/hive#1402

[spencer-tb]

Closing! :)