Skip to content

Design an evidence-grounded diagnostic agent - #9

Merged
engkimo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/diagnostic-agent-design
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

Design an evidence-grounded diagnostic agent#9
engkimo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/diagnostic-agent-design

Conversation

@engkimo

@engkimo engkimo commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • add a detailed architecture and implementation plan for a VoxBench diagnostic agent
  • define evidence-grounded claims, bounded read-only tools, deterministic analyzers, and citation validation
  • design guided UI operations that can focus timeline evidence, open incidents, compare runs, and play recordings without arbitrary browser automation
  • document the proposed OIDC operator authentication model and external LLM egress policy
  • add a concise project memory file with agreed decisions, implementation order, and remaining environment-specific choices

Why

VoxBench already correlates SIP, RTP, pipeline, provider, runtime, configuration, and recording evidence on a shared run timeline. Operators still need specialized knowledge to interpret that evidence and navigate to the relevant points.

This design proposes an evidence-grounded diagnostic session rather than a generic chatbot. Deterministic code remains responsible for timing, packet, media, and rule calculations, while the model plans investigations, compares hypotheses, and explains supported conclusions. The same evidence references also drive a guided UI experience so the agent can show the operator what to inspect.

User and developer impact

  • establishes the intended product experience before implementation begins
  • separates deterministic diagnosis from model reasoning and presentation
  • defines safe UI command and authorization boundaries
  • provides a staged implementation sequence from internal refactoring through a read-only agent MVP
  • records durable decisions for future contributors and implementation sessions

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • documentation-only change; no runtime tests were required

Notes

  • this PR does not implement the diagnostic agent or change runtime behavior
  • unrelated local screenshots and working files were intentionally excluded

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f15be276-d90e-41be-b2b1-bcab2709e7eb

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@engkimo
engkimo marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2026 05:46
@engkimo
engkimo merged commit 688b866 into main Aug 10, 2026
6 checks passed
@engkimo
engkimo deleted the agent/diagnostic-agent-design branch August 10, 2026 05:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant