Update BM25 logic to be consistent with Lucene#9
Open
lilyjge wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks for the PR! The extension is undergoing heavy changes, but we are planning on integrating this into it once it is more stable. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I'm working with Professor Jimmy Lin, and I noticed that the BM25 logic used for FTS is different than the Lucene implementation shown in this paper. Since Lucene is a very widely used search engine, perhaps it would be nice to align the logic?