Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 7.15.0 to 9.26.0#8

Open
dmgoldstein1 wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
snyk-fix-ab79a1980a5cb2fa3544e31a19fb1108
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 7.15.0 to 9.26.0#8
dmgoldstein1 wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
snyk-fix-ab79a1980a5cb2fa3544e31a19fb1108

Conversation

@dmgoldstein1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Uncontrolled Recursion
SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420
  60  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 1, 2026 03:31
@socket-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updatedeslint@​7.15.0 ⏵ 9.26.089 -3100 +2100 +197 +47100

View full report

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR is a Snyk-generated security update to address an ESLint vulnerability by upgrading eslint from 7.15.0 to 9.26.0.

Changes:

  • Bumped eslint devDependency to 9.26.0 in package.json.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread package.json
"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "4.10.0",
"@typescript-eslint/parser": "4.10.0",
"eslint": "7.15.0",
"eslint": "9.26.0",
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 1, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Upgrading to eslint@9 will break the current CI/dev runtime setup: this repo’s GitHub Actions pipeline uses Node 12.x (.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml), and ESLint v9 requires a newer Node version, so npm run compile (which runs npm run lint) will fail. Either bump the CI Node version (and document the required Node version for contributors) or choose an ESLint major compatible with the project’s Node baseline.

Suggested change
"eslint": "9.26.0",
"eslint": "8.57.0",

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment thread package.json
"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "4.10.0",
"@typescript-eslint/parser": "4.10.0",
"eslint": "7.15.0",
"eslint": "9.26.0",
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 1, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

eslint@9 is a major upgrade but @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin / @typescript-eslint/parser are still pinned to 4.10.0. That combination is not supported and will typically fail install and/or linting. Please upgrade the @typescript-eslint packages (and any related config changes) to versions compatible with ESLint 9, or keep ESLint on a compatible major.

Suggested change
"eslint": "9.26.0",
"eslint": "7.32.0",

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants