Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ad9e662844
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| self, | ||
| workflow_id: int, | ||
| input_config: InputConfig, | ||
| input_config: Optional[InputConfig] = None, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle absent input_config before building WorkflowExecution
This method now allows input_config=None, but the returned WorkflowExecution still unconditionally evaluates input_config.to_dict(). When callers rely on the new default (e.g., workflows that do not require external inputs), the request can succeed and then fail locally with AttributeError, making the new optional behavior unusable.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Auto-generated SDK update from full API audit on branch
master.