Skip to content

Shard managed Codex integration signal - #758

Closed
lilly-luo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/shard-managed-codex
Closed

lilly-luo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/shard-managed-codex

Conversation

@lilly-luo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hypothesis

Long managed Codex lanes increase exposure to hosted-runner shutdowns and make the affected scenario opaque. Splitting the lane across fresh, bounded runners should reduce that exposure and localize any hang.

Change

  • move managed-config coverage into an independent signal-only workflow, so runner cancellation cannot cancel required e2e
  • split Codex into disjoint workspace, discovery-policy, and remaining-fixture shards
  • retain a single Claude signal shard
  • keep unique artifacts and 25-minute per-shard bounds

Validation

  • uv run pytest tests/test_integration_contract.py -q (4 passed)
  • uv run ruff check tests/ scripts/run_integration.py
  • uv run ruff format --check tests/ scripts/run_integration.py
  • collection selectors: Codex workspace 1 test, discovery 12 tests, remaining fixtures 6 tests
  • workflow YAML parsed successfully

This is one experimental CI restructuring option for comparison; the managed signal remains non-required.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant