Conversation
Add in fix to test cck properly
…e each failing item to be queried and ran in isolation easily
|
Posting in here so there's a visible update outside of code |
|
ping @brasmusson after all merges, re-analysis and tidy up. I found one new issue (Which will be auto-fixed once we are testing against CCK v29 - we're ahead of the game). I have now re-enabled a bunch of the previously failing CCK scenarios and we now have only 10 left to fix. |
|
JRuby issue requires a major bump (Given the next version is going to be a major - I'm going to do a bump in a new PR and then fold this in. Small ticket. |
| return if identical_keys? | ||
| return "Detected extra keys in message #{message_name}: #{extra_keys}" if extra_keys.any? | ||
|
|
||
| # TODO: Remove this override when the CCK is being checked at v29+ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@olleolleolle One example here (And below in comparator), of non-conformance items tripping things up because they're very out of sync.
TL;DR - I'm pursuing CCK v22 conformance which is out of sync with other bits
|
JRuby being fixed in #1824 |
Description
Currently cucumber is v20 of the CCK conformant.
First step is to make it v22 conformant. Which requires adding in a bunch of new scenarios to the CCK testing, and then validating which items are still passing and what changes need to be made
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
work as expected)
Checklist:
Current passing state 75/93
Items to check / fix (First pass)
Attachmentis missingtimestampTestStepResultis missing some keys