Skip to content

chore(release): mark worker protocol expansion minor - #45

Closed
chh-ay wants to merge 1 commit into
0.4.0from
chore/worker-acknowledgement-minor
Closed

chore(release): mark worker protocol expansion minor#45
chh-ay wants to merge 1 commit into
0.4.0from
chore/worker-acknowledgement-minor

Conversation

@chh-ay

@chh-ay chh-ay commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Decision

The ready and fatal additions to the published WorkerAcknowledgement discriminated union are approved for v0.4.0. Although additive at runtime, the expansion can break exhaustive TypeScript switches, so the release note must carry a minor rather than patch bump.

This is the dedicated release-metadata reconciliation for #44. It changes no runtime code or generated API artifact.

Verification

  • bunx changeset status --since=origin/0.4.0@sheetwrite/core minor; dependent packages patch; no major bumps
  • bun run changeset:ci — passed

Approval was given explicitly after reviewing the public API expansion. Plan 096 remains blocked until this reconciliation merges.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
sheetwrite Building Building Preview, Comment Jul 26, 2026 7:06pm

@chh-ay

chh-ay commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closing by release-policy decision. PR #44's worker API expansion is accepted for the future v0.4.0 release, but version reconciliation should happen once the full release scope is complete. Promoting only @sheetwrite/core now would plan core 0.4.0 while dependent packages remain 0.3.2, conflicting with the repository's release-branch version-parity gate. Runtime implementation and Required CI remain green; no release is being cut yet.

@chh-ay chh-ay closed this Jul 26, 2026
@chh-ay
chh-ay deleted the chore/worker-acknowledgement-minor branch July 26, 2026 19:08
@chh-ay chh-ay mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2026
36 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant