Skip to content

feat: 非阻塞检查网络注册状态,优化网络注册逻辑 - #59

Closed
chenxuuu wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
fix-issue-57
Closed

chenxuuu wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
fix-issue-57

Conversation

@chenxuuu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

修复 #57

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 16, 2026 02:00
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

此拉取请求旨在解决 #57 提到的问题,通过将网络注册过程从阻塞式改为非阻塞式,显著优化了设备的启动逻辑。这一改进避免了设备在网络注册耗时时出现卡顿,提升了用户体验和设备的响应能力。同时,它确保了关键的启动通知仅在网络完全就绪后才发送。

Highlights

  • 非阻塞网络注册: 将网络注册检查从阻塞式改为非阻塞式,避免设备启动时卡顿。
  • 周期性检查: 在主循环中引入了周期性网络注册状态检查机制,确保设备持续监控网络状态。
  • 启动通知逻辑优化: 调整了启动通知的发送逻辑,确保仅在配置有效且网络已注册后才发送通知,即使网络注册稍后完成。
Changelog
  • code/code.ino
    • 移除了 setup() 函数中阻塞式的网络注册等待循环。
    • 在 loop() 函数中实现了周期性的非阻塞网络注册状态检查。
    • 更新了启动通知的发送条件,使其依赖于成功的网络注册。
Activity
  • 目前没有与此拉取请求相关的评论或审查活动。
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

本次变更将阻塞式的网络注册检查改为了非阻塞的周期性检查,避免了设备启动时可能出现的长时间等待,这是一个很好的优化。代码逻辑清晰,实现了预期的功能。我只发现一处代码重复的问题,建议提取成一个独立的函数以提高代码的可维护性。

Comment thread code/code.ino

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

该 PR 针对 Issue #57,将“等待网络注册”的阻塞式流程改为后台周期性检查,避免设备在网络注册阶段卡死,提升串口/HTTP 的可用性与可调试性。

Changes:

  • 移除 setup() 中阻塞等待 CEREG 注册的 while 循环,启动流程不再被网络注册卡住
  • 增加 networkRegistered 状态与定时检查逻辑,在 loop() 中周期性检测并在注册成功后触发启动通知
  • 启动通知发送条件调整为“配置有效且已注册网络”,并在注册成功瞬间补发一次

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

Comment thread code/code.ino
Comment thread code/code.ino
@chenxuuu chenxuuu closed this Jun 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants