Skip to content

UI overhaul#77

Draft
ccssmnn wants to merge 35 commits intomainfrom
ccssmnn/migrate-to-base-ui-and-improve
Draft

UI overhaul#77
ccssmnn wants to merge 35 commits intomainfrom
ccssmnn/migrate-to-base-ui-and-improve

Conversation

@ccssmnn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@ccssmnn ccssmnn commented Mar 21, 2026

This PR started as a PR for migrating to base-ui and turned into an overhaul of the UI.
It's even more clean. The interactions are more intentional.
The organization of feature specific code got cleaned up a lot.

ccssmnn and others added 30 commits February 24, 2026 22:57
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add backend support with handler/operation/part hierarchy:
- router → handler → operations/parts → parts → ∅
- New rules: only-router-may-import-handlers, only-handlers-may-import-operations
- Extended: no-feature-part-composition (import-level for server), only-screens-and-widgets-may-import-parts (+ handler, operation)
- no-utility-definitions-in-ui-modules: server parts/operations exempt (they ARE the logic)
- Fixed no-deep-feature-imports alias detection in error messages
- Removed use-case/operation model, replaced with handler/operation/part
- Server rules commented out in eslint config until migration

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Mar 21, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
tilly Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 24, 2026 9:48pm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant