Repository navigation
Conversation
Freeze exploratory seed 890000 and topic document structure before generation. Catalog v5 adds Family 12, the collapse-resistant analogue of Cycle 6 general word spacing, instead of another lexical whitelist. Cover-greedy v4 is unchanged. Seed 880000 stays unseen. Co-authored-by: Byte271 <byte271@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Family 12 word-boundary newlines reach mean density 38.0 and collapsed intact/root 0.164. Durable detections stay 0/4 after whitespace collapse on this n=4 snapshot. Catalog v5 is not retuned. Seed 880000 remains the disjoint validation split. Co-authored-by: Byte271 <byte271@users.noreply.github.com>
Disjoint seed 880000 replicates D1: wrap density 37.875, collapsed intact/root 0.080, durable 0/4 after whitespace collapse, Cycle 6 spacing 4/4 after collapse. Do not retune v5 on 890000 or 880000. Confirmation seeds remain unseen. Co-authored-by: Byte271 <byte271@users.noreply.github.com>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 25012ae02c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| ) -> dict[str, object]: | ||
| seed_base = CYCLE7_STAGE_D1_EXPLORATORY_SEED_BASE | ||
| topic = CYCLE7_STAGE_D1_TOPIC | ||
| assert_rule_construction_seed(seed_base) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When run_stage_d1 is invoked, including with --samples-from to reproduce the committed evidence, this assertion always raises because the same commit sets CYCLE7_ACTIVE_EXPLORATORY_SEED_BASES to an empty tuple. Consequently the default non-validation CLI cannot load or evaluate any samples. Restrict the rule-construction check to fresh generation, or use an admission check that allows replay of the now-used exploratory seed.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Fresh generation still requires an active rule-construction seed. --samples-from rescoring uses exploratory-development admission so the frozen 890000 evidence can be replayed after catalog v5 is locked. Co-authored-by: Byte271 <byte271@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
Cycle 7 Stages A–C showed that local semantically conservative English surface equivalence plus punctuation-newline layout stays in a four-site regime (means 4.0–4.75). Catalog v4 is not a Cycle 6 whitespace-collapse replacement.
This PR adds catalog v5 (Family 12: word-boundary newline) from updated
main. Cover-greedy v4 is unchanged. No new lexical whitelist.Family 12 replaces a single ASCII space between two alphabetic words of length ≥2 with LF. That is the collapse-resistant analogue of Cycle 6 general word spacing.
whitespace-collapse-v1preserves LF. HYPOTHESIS: a wrap/reflow sanitizer would erase it.Seeds
document structureindependent checkDo not retune on 810000, 860000, 820000, or 870000.
Results (
PROMISING_DEVELOPMENT, not formal confirmation)Writeup:
docs/cycle7/stage-d-decision.mdws_collapseWMws_collapseWM890000880000Transformed UW: 0 detections on every arm. Combined-after-collapse remains worse than durable-only (cover-greedy still spends collapse-undone spacing slots). Unlike Stage B, the detector reduction replicated on the held-out seed.
n=4+4 is not 7/192 or 0/192. Do not open Cycle 7 formal confirmation from this PR.
Review follow-up
Codex P1: after locking
CYCLE7_ACTIVE_EXPLORATORY_SEED_BASESto(),run_stage_d1could not replay the frozen D1 evidence. Fresh generation still requiresassert_rule_construction_seedand stays blocked.--samples-fromreplay now uses exploratory-development admission so seed 890000 can be rescored. Catalog v5 and the 890000/880000 artifacts were not regenerated.Test plan
--samples-fromreplay of 890000 is admitted