WIP: alternative proof of strong normalization, following Lemma 3.2.1 - #21
Draft
j-bmn wants to merge 8 commits into
Draft
WIP: alternative proof of strong normalization, following Lemma 3.2.1#21j-bmn wants to merge 8 commits into
j-bmn wants to merge 8 commits into
Conversation
lafeychine
marked this pull request as draft
December 10, 2024 13:23
j-bmn
force-pushed
the
strong-normalization-variant
branch
from
December 10, 2024 18:18
cca8446 to
c6a0460
Compare
j-bmn
force-pushed
the
strong-normalization-variant
branch
from
December 10, 2024 20:05
ad22772 to
ee0c0cf
Compare
Author
|
The proof is now complete! However, here be dragons: it is currently very ugly. Further, it is currently incompatible with upstream changes (see #19). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An alternative proof of strong normalization, following Lemma 3.2.1 in the lecture notes.
This is incompatible with #19, as it is not extended with product and sum types.
Most likely, it will have to be moved to a separate file (although really, that depends a bit on how closely this repository should follow the lecture notes).