Repository navigation
Conversation
…ary for the existing validator)
|
Thanks for the contribution. I’m keeping #31 as the single canonical PR for #14 and closed the earlier duplicate PRs #17–#30 so the review has one source of truth. I checked the current #31 diff. The glossary text is broadly aligned with the issue, but the PR is not merge-ready yet because #14 explicitly requires both:
Please update #31 only (do not open another PR) to add that README link. Also add the final newline to The important trust-boundary wording should remain explicit: digests bind contents but are not signatures/proof of truth; Once that small delta is pushed, we can review this one PR normally. |
Closes #14
Summary