Repository navigation
merge fields for final model - #29
Merged
Merged
Conversation
commit: |
cowboyd
force-pushed
the
type-diagnostic
branch
from
September 9, 2026 01:21
5be8881 to
aff6310
Compare
cowboyd
force-pushed
the
ts-pipeline-merge-fields
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 9, 2026 01:40
5e0f941 to
e9845a5
Compare
cowboyd
force-pushed
the
type-diagnostic
branch
from
September 9, 2026 01:40
aff6310 to
265bdaf
Compare
cowboyd
force-pushed
the
ts-pipeline-merge-fields
branch
from
September 9, 2026 01:54
e9845a5 to
2417ae7
Compare
cowboyd
force-pushed
the
type-diagnostic
branch
from
September 9, 2026 01:54
265bdaf to
2417ae7
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Getting our checks to pass that our types work. This more directly merges the fields to get the final value
Approach
Ran diagnostics to check, and iterate on constraints. Seems to meet about the same feel we had in #21.