Repository navigation
Fix KeyError When Chaining PARTITION on a Redefined/Transformed Term - #592
Merged
Merged
Conversation
hadia206
changed the title
PARTITION on a Redefined/Transformed Term
hadia206
changed the title
PARTITION on a Redefined/Transformed TermKeyError When Chaining PARTITION on a Redefined/Transformed Term
hadia206
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 9, 2026 22:32
hadia206
requested review from
a team,
john-sanchez31,
juankx-bodo and
knassre-bodo
and removed request for
a team
October 9, 2026 22:32
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Linked ticket
Closes #590
Type of change
What changed and why?
Chaining a second
PARTITIONon top of aPARTITIONwhose key comes from aCALCULATEthat redefines a term using its own old value raised an unhandledKeyError. Same problem as #557 but on a different path.Fixed by making the second path match the first one.
How I tested this?
Notes for reviewers