Skip to content

docs: run the LangChain first-read example without cloning - #42

Merged
gjwang merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/clone-free-langchain-20261108
Nov 7, 2026
Merged

gjwang merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/clone-free-langchain-20261108

Conversation

@gjwang

@gjwang gjwang commented Nov 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Owner: Web growth Leader 01a133d7-789f-7241-af41-185e49fc0fed

The LangChain documentation example currently asks readers to clone the repository before trying it. Add the same commit-pinned remote uv run command to both READMEs so a reader can search and read documentation without that checkout step. The existing local command and all Python source remain unchanged.

The URL pins example source at f6199662a459abebccba5c3451d80bf5e9a199e4; it does not lock all transitive dependencies. Python 3.11+, uv, beta status and the no-model/no-account scope stay explicit. This uses uv's documented HTTP(S) script support: https://docs.astral.sh/uv/reference/cli/#uv-run.

Validation: the exact remote command ran once from an empty task directory with internal QA enabled, native exit 0; search_docs and read_doc both returned success and document content was nonempty. This is an SDK QA result, not model-driven E2E or customer adoption. Total elapsed 6.099 seconds includes download, environment preparation and execution; HTTP attempt count was not instrumented. The temporary runtime was removed after completion. Both README command blocks were compared with the executed argv; git diff --check passed. No additional test suite, Web build or live chain RPC was run for these two documentation additions.

Local evidence: .evidence/growth-clone-free-first-read-20261107-1640Z/{execution-plan,remote.actual,remote-verification.actual,runtime-cleanup.actual,candidate}.json and remote.stdout.json/remote.stderr.log. Independent review is recorded beside the candidate before merge.

Refs #41.

@gjwang
gjwang merged commit 0df6876 into main Nov 7, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant