Skip to content

fix(docker): ensure build trees are chowned for all remapped UIDs#1

Open
pgk83 wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcryptic-gw:mainfrom
pgk83:fix/remapped-uid-tui-permissions
Open

fix(docker): ensure build trees are chowned for all remapped UIDs#1
pgk83 wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcryptic-gw:mainfrom
pgk83:fix/remapped-uid-tui-permissions

Conversation

@pgk83

@pgk83 pgk83 commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What does this PR do?

Related Issue

Fixes #

Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🔒 Security fix
  • 📝 Documentation update
  • ✅ Tests (adding or improving test coverage)
  • ♻️ Refactor (no behavior change)
  • 🎯 New skill (bundled or hub)

Changes Made

How to Test

Checklist

Code

  • I've read the Contributing Guide
  • My commit messages follow Conventional Commits (fix(scope):, feat(scope):, etc.)
  • I searched for existing PRs to make sure this isn't a duplicate
  • My PR contains only changes related to this fix/feature (no unrelated commits)
  • I've run pytest tests/ -q and all tests pass
  • I've added tests for my changes (required for bug fixes, strongly encouraged for features)
  • I've tested on my platform:

Documentation & Housekeeping

  • I've updated relevant documentation (README, docs/, docstrings) — or N/A
  • I've updated cli-config.yaml.example if I added/changed config keys — or N/A
  • I've updated CONTRIBUTING.md or AGENTS.md if I changed architecture or workflows — or N/A
  • I've considered cross-platform impact (Windows, macOS) per the compatibility guide — or N/A
  • I've updated tool descriptions/schemas if I changed tool behavior — or N/A

For New Skills

  • This skill is broadly useful to most users (if bundled) — see Contributing Guide
  • SKILL.md follows the standard format (frontmatter, trigger conditions, steps, pitfalls)
  • No external dependencies that aren't already available (prefer stdlib, curl, existing Hermes tools)
  • I've tested the skill end-to-end: hermes --toolsets skills -q "Use the X skill to do Y"

Screenshots / Logs

bitcryptic-gw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2026
Seven Copilot inline review comments on NousResearch#37679, four worth landing
in a polish pass before merge:

1. _dispose_unused_adapter signature: 'BasePlatformAdapter' ->
   'BasePlatformAdapter | None'. The function explicitly handles
   None and the reconnect watcher calls it with None in the
   except arm, so the annotation now matches the actual contract.

2. (duplicate of #1 on a different line) — same fix.

3. except Exception in _dispose_unused_adapter — the reviewer
   asked about asyncio.CancelledError swallowing. On Python 3.8+
   (Hermes requires 3.13, see pyproject.toml), CancelledError
   inherits from BaseException, NOT Exception, so the existing
   'except Exception' does NOT swallow task cancellation. Added
   an explicit comment explaining the contract so future readers
   don't repeat the analysis. We don't re-raise because the
   watcher loop intentionally treats dispose failures as
   best-effort: a failed dispose on an unowned adapter should not
   take down the watcher that's keeping the gateway alive.

4. _response_store = None after close in api_server.py — the
   reviewer flagged this for idempotency. Decided to keep the
   non-None state intentionally: setting it to None cascades
   to ~9 callers that access self._response_store without a
   None check, and 'close() is idempotent on a closed sqlite3
   Connection' means the current code is already safe. The
   type stays stable; LSP doesn't flag a cascade of
   reportOptionalMemberAccess errors. (This matches the
   pre-existing pattern in the codebase — e.g.
   _mark_disconnected doesn't reset state to None either.)

5. _build_adapter_with_store: reviewer worried about
   disconnect() failing on the self.name property if
   __init__ wasn't called. Already handled: we set
   'adapter.platform = Platform.API_SERVER' so the
   'self.platform.value.title()' property returns
   'Api_Server' without raising. The exception-swallowing
   branch in disconnect() does call self.name via the
   logger.debug format, so this is a real path that needs
   the platform attribute, and we have it.

6. test_disconnect_closes_response_store: bare 'pytest.raises(Exception)'
   -> 'pytest.raises(sqlite3.ProgrammingError)'. The bare
   Exception matcher would silently accept AttributeError,
   OperationalError, env-related issues, etc. The specific
   exception type ('Cannot operate on a closed database') is
   the actual signal we want — proves the SQLite conn is
   closed, not just that *something* raised.

7. test_nonretryable_failure_disposes_unowned_adapter:
   assertion tightened from '>= 1' to '== 1' on
   adapter._disconnect_calls. The docstring said 'exactly once',
   the assertion now matches. Catches the hypothetical
   'watcher disposes the same adapter twice' regression that
   '>=' would have missed.
bitcryptic-gw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2026
…ch#37677)

Anthropic enforces two independent ceilings per image:
1. 5 MB encoded byte size
2. 8000 px longest side

Hermes only guarded #1. A tall screenshot (e.g. 1200x12000 at 0.06 MB)
passes every byte check but fails the pixel check, returning a
non-retryable HTTP 400 that permanently bricks the conversation thread.

Fixes:
- error_classifier: add 'image dimensions exceed' pattern to
  _IMAGE_TOO_LARGE_PATTERNS so the 400 is classified as image_too_large
  and triggers the shrink/retry path instead of falling through to
  non-retryable error.
- conversation_compression: check pixel dimensions (via Pillow) even
  when byte size is under the 4 MB target. If max(dims) > 8000, force
  shrink.
- vision_tools._resize_image_for_vision: add optional max_dimension param.
  When set, images exceeding the pixel cap are downscaled even if they're
  under the byte budget. The resize loop now checks both byte AND pixel
  limits before accepting a candidate.

Closes NousResearch#37677
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant