💍 Rings! 💍 - #54
Merged
Merged
💍 Rings! 💍#54
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A from-scratch new attempt at transits of planets with opaque rings. Creates a new
RingedSystemclass built onOblateSystem. Still handles arbitrary order polynomial limb darkening, arbitrary 3D geometry of the planet+rings. Takes ~10s of ms per likelihood call now compared to ~3ms for the vanilla oblate system, but at least it now correctly handles all of the possible intersections. Also fixes a bug the incorrectly handled extremely thin on-sky ellipses with 4 intersection points with the star instead of 2.