Repository navigation
docs(ops): the thirty-four goals that outran the audit, and the eleven nobody had named - #119
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…n nobody had named The v2.0 audit of 2026-09-05 covered 339 identifiers. The goals list now holds 373 and none has been removed, so 34 entered this manifest after the only pass that has ever checked one against the code. Twenty-three are accounted for somewhere in the notes above. Eleven were named nowhere in the file at all. All eleven are audited here, against beatrax@origin/main. Nine are satisfied, each with what it was read against, because two of them turn on a detail a summary would lose: A3-R22's bound is the STRICT comparison rather than the seven days, and A3-R23 holds because the reader-facing column list does not carry a date. Two were not satisfied, and neither could have been settled by reading the code. Both were already recorded `walked — defect` in the product's walk ledger on 2026-09-13, from a Galaxy A51 and an iPhone 12 mini: E2-R23 kept its offer after its refusal was written, and E5-R28 had its platform answer overwritten by a view. Both are closed by beatrax#846. What the pass does not establish is written down with it: the 339 were read against main as it stood on 2026-09-05 and have not been re-read. Five of the twenty-three were spot-checked and all five hold. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Wessel Verheij <info@nightworks.io>
github-actions
Bot
added
operations
awaiting-maintainer
|
github-actions
Bot
added
awaiting-maintainer
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this records
The manifest's only line-by-line audit ran on 2026-09-05 over 339 identifiers. The goals list now holds 373, with none removed — so 34 goals have never been checked against the code, and nothing in the file said which.
The eleven:
C1-R15 C1-R16 C1-R17 G7-R16 G7-R17 G7-R18 E5-R28 E2-R23 A3-R22 A3-R23 A5-R18Outcome
All eleven audited against
beatrax@origin/main. Nine satisfied, two not.The nine are recorded with what each was read against, because two turn on a detail a summary would lose:
>/<on ±7 days, so the widest gap matched is six, shorter than weekly, whichC2-R20makes the shortest cadence. The exclusive comparison is the bound.NearTotalMatch::CONFLICT_COLUMNS, the fields put to the reader, carries no date and no ordinal.The two that were not satisfied are the interesting half: neither could have been settled by reading the code. Both were already
walked — defectin the product's walk ledger on 2026-09-13.none_enrolled.Both are closed by beatrax#846.
What it does not establish
Written into the note rather than left implied: the 339 were read against main as it stood on 2026-09-05 and have not been re-read. Five of the twenty-three accounted-for goals were spot-checked —
C8-R22,D1-R29,A8-R27,F3-R37,C1-R18— and all five hold.statusstaysstaged. Moving it is a separate decision under OPS-R16.