docs: align product claims with shipped behavior - #51
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
A source-backed accuracy audit found narrative claims that overstated or misdescribed shipped behavior across the documentation and marketing site.
Causal model
Documentation now describes the actual exported and runtime behavior, and marks confirmed product gaps as limited instead of implying unimplemented integration.
Failure behavior
Documentation-only; corrections call out enforced runtime errors and current limitations without changing runtime contracts.
Optimization evidence
Not benchmark-driven.
Verification
npm run checkAutomation disclosure
Codex performed the source-backed audit, corrections, formatting, and verification.