Skip to content

Conversation

@embray
Copy link
Collaborator

@embray embray commented Dec 23, 2025

Resolves #119

makes APIs that work on mappings and sequences more explicit, and treats
them more inline with other value types (even though they are just
wrappers around asdf_value_t for now)

need to clarify the documentation a bit more, especially how
asdf_value_as_mapping/sequence borrow a reference

gh-119
@embray embray merged commit 5ecbdd1 into main Dec 23, 2025
12 checks passed
@embray embray deleted the issue-119 branch December 23, 2025 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Explicit types for asdf_mapping_t and asdf_sequence_t

2 participants