Skip to content

[TEST] Missing Tests for SSRF Security Functions#230

Draft
arumes31 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test/ssrf-coverage-16799514612356437491
Draft

[TEST] Missing Tests for SSRF Security Functions#230
arumes31 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test/ssrf-coverage-16799514612356437491

Conversation

@arumes31
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@arumes31 arumes31 commented Jun 4, 2026

This PR adds comprehensive tests for SSRF security functions in internal/security/ssrf.go.

Key Changes

  • IsInternalIP: Added coverage for IPv4-mapped IPv6, ULA, and link-local unicast addresses.
  • IsSafeURL: Added coverage for IPv6 literals in brackets and IP literals with ports.
  • SafeSocketControl: Added coverage for addresses without ports and IPv6 variations.

Results

  • IsInternalIP: 100% coverage
  • SafeSocketControl: 100% coverage
  • IsSafeURL: 93.8% coverage (remaining branch is unreachable without mocking net.LookupIP failures).
  • All existing tests pass.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 16799514612356437491 started by @arumes31

This commit enhances the test suite for SSRF security functions in
internal/security/ssrf.go.

Changes:
- Expanded TestIsInternalIP to cover IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses,
  Unique Local Addresses (ULA), and link-local unicast addresses.
- Added test cases to TestIsSafeURL for IPv6 literals in brackets
  and IP literals with explicit ports to ensure better input validation coverage.
- Enhanced TestSafeSocketControl to handle addresses without ports
  and various IPv6 address formats.

Coverage for IsInternalIP and SafeSocketControl is now at 100%.
IsSafeURL reached 93.8% coverage.

Co-authored-by: arumes31 <114224498+arumes31@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6e224665-746a-414f-9717-d08cfcebb330

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch test/ssrf-coverage-16799514612356437491

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant