Skip to content

Would you consider switching redis to valkey, or staying with redis <= 7.2? #173

Description

@bing-nu

Have you read a contributing guide?

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md
  • I have searched the existing requests and didn't find any that were similar
  • I have considered creating a pull request instead and want to proceed

Clear and concise description of the problem

Do you have any plans, or would you consider, switching to valkey instead of staying with redis? In addition to superior multithreaded performance, valkey generally is more efficient with memory. Alternatively, do you plan to stick with redis <= 7.2? I would like to use valkey instead of redis but do not want to introduce any future breaking changes.

Suggested solution

Update docker-compose.yml to use valkey/valkey-bundle:9.0.1 (the latest stable version as of 2025-12) and functionally equivalent to redis-stack-server:7.2.0 (the currently used redis in any-sync-dockercompose). If a more minimal image is desired and the extra functionality of stack-server is not needed, then valkey/valkey:9.0.1-alpine that also loads valkey-bloom module (which the documentation states is a hard requirement for filenode), although this is more complicated in docker compose unless additional valkey.conf is included in any-sync repo.

Alternative

No response

Additional context

No response

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions