Fix PDF OCR review blockers - #392
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Jul 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stacked on the exact current head reported by #366 (01c28ba). The author fork branch was force-reset to a partial, diverged history, so aj/pr366-review-base preserves that reviewed head as the comparison base.
Fixes the concrete review blockers identified on #366:
Validation:
The larger generic processing-stage and derivation-provenance API redesign is intentionally left for a separate coordinated schema migration; this follow-up stays backward-compatible and focused on the correctness, security, and bounded design fixes.