Skip to content

docs: define resource-aware CI and shared storage architecture - #343

Merged
aliasfoxkde merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/ci-storage-efficiency-architecture-20261031
Nov 3, 2026
Merged

aliasfoxkde merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/ci-storage-efficiency-architecture-20261031

Conversation

@aliasfoxkde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Adds the implementation architecture and phased execution plan for GitForge's CI/storage efficiency initiative.

The plan covers:

  • Resource-aware control/fast/standard/heavy/background scheduling, admission control, weighted fairness, resource enforcement and queue observability.
  • Immutable content-addressed storage, trust namespaces, manifests/references, managed Git workspaces, optional reflink/OverlayFS/Btrfs providers, and lease-aware two-phase GC.
  • Sound incremental test impact and complete test-result fingerprints, reusing and reviewing the existing feat: smart CI + dependency/change-impact graph optimization #322 graph branch rather than merging its stale branch wholesale.
  • Shared test-runner integration and a toolchain bake-off covering nextest, sccache, cargo-chef, lust-lang, ts-rust, JS/Python tool alternatives and the supplied server/database benchmark suites.
  • Gate 0 remediation for the current compile, cargo-vet and GitForge API polling failures, along with public runner trust and atomic storage validation.

Tracking

Umbrella: #342

Workstreams:

Related existing issues: #277, #284, #288, #318, #322, #335, #336, #337 and #258.

Scope and validation

This PR is documentation/design only. It does not change runtime scheduling, storage, test selection, credentials, or runner behavior. The document explicitly records that current main and PR #336 were not fully green at the audit point, and defines exact validation gates before optimization rollout.

Please review the execution order and safety invariants before implementation PRs are opened.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 96fb1f78-ac9b-4352-b5ba-71f572f8d153
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

CodeRabbit Verify

  • Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.

@aliasfoxkde
aliasfoxkde force-pushed the docs/ci-storage-efficiency-architecture-20261031 branch from 16c888c to 74ce6cd Compare November 3, 2026 21:53
@aliasfoxkde
aliasfoxkde merged commit c720150 into main Nov 3, 2026
8 checks passed
@aliasfoxkde
aliasfoxkde deleted the docs/ci-storage-efficiency-architecture-20261031 branch November 3, 2026 22:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant