Repository navigation
Make project font and graphics selection reproducible - #19
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Engineering proposals could select suitable fonts and graphics but still recreate rendering checks for each document. This adds a reusable project visual profile and a shared static HTML/SVG/PDF export pipeline that checks actual glyph suppliers, embedded font identities and weights, selected graphic bytes, native SVG geometry and visible placement. Missing resources and unsupported tools cannot produce a successful required review.
Profiles retain explicit project/client authority, typography roles, palette and artwork provenance without defining a universal CSE brand. Six synthetic behavioral cases cover direct and indirect requests, client overrides, missing fonts, editorial artwork/body preservation and text-only negatives. A committed-source packager makes version
0.2.0-alpha.7reproducible without dirty, ignored or untracked files.Validation:
The full local pinned-parser regression passed: 1225 tests across 77 suites; 4 optional checks skipped. The opt-in real-browser test passed separately. Python 3.10/3.12 branch and pull-request CI passed on the exact final commit. Fresh installed-session verification is a separate installation check. Optional rendering tools are existing local dependencies; this change installs no packages and alters no execution permissions.