Repository navigation
Preserve budgeted engineering context and document the complete CSE workflow - #18
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Repeated model records can exhaust an agent’s source allowance, while sampled-check input shapes and qualitative goal/evidence meanings need clearer guidance. This update adds optional lossless compact assembled context with an exact UTF-8 byte cap and explicit refusal, plus a strict scope-pinned sampled-trace adapter and discoverable schema help. The default full view and existing language checker remain unchanged.
The shared workflow now carries qualitative goal direction, distinct evidence stages, and reviews actual output omissions. It also integrates the reviewed font/SVG/reference-selection guidance, expands the adversarial corpus to 40 cases, and replaces the README with a thorough source-linked guide to all eleven skills, setup, checks, components, examples, and result limits. The technical guide’s current skill inventory is aligned.
Validation:
The comparison report separates source completeness, finite execution, process compliance and engineering acceptance, and records the small sample, voluntary checking, common infrastructure changes, source-budget limits and remaining omissions. The dirty canonical checkout and previous results were preserved.