V46 Gate 7: Local Interface Comprehension Rehearsal#230
Conversation
Add package-backed V46LocalInterfaceComprehensionRehearsal with deterministic source-safe local rehearsal metadata for docs, product routes, API/MCP, ChatGPT App, Bitcode Chat, proof telemetry, and repair readback. Wire generator, checker, exports, focused protocol tests, Gate Quality and Canon Quality workflows, regenerated V46 artifacts, and spec/roadmap/README documentation for Gate 7 closure. Validation: pnpm run check:v46-gate1 --skip-branch-check; pnpm run check:v46-gate2 --skip-branch-check --skip-package-tests; pnpm run check:v46-gate3 --skip-branch-check --skip-package-tests; pnpm run check:v46-gate4 --skip-branch-check --skip-package-tests; pnpm run check:v46-gate5 --skip-branch-check --skip-package-tests; pnpm run check:v46-gate6 --skip-branch-check --skip-package-tests; pnpm run check:v46-gate7; pnpm --filter @bitcode/protocol typecheck; pnpm --filter @bitcode/protocol test; git diff --check.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2d10043b3f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| const allAuthorityIds = rows.flatMap((row) => row.authorityIds); | ||
| const rowsMissingRequiredCopy = rows.filter((row) => !row.requiredCopyPresent).map((row) => row.surfaceId); | ||
| const rowsMissingSourceFiles = rows.filter((row) => !row.sourceFilesPresent).map((row) => row.surfaceId); | ||
| const sourcePathsToScan = [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When an unsafe marker or forbidden disclosure phrase lands in one of the actual rehearsed surfaces (for example uapi/app/packs/PacksPageClient.tsx, API/MCP contracts, ChatGPT App files, or proof telemetry files), Gate 7 still reports secretMarkerHits/forbiddenPhraseHits as empty because this scan list only covers spec/readme/script/test files and never includes rows.flatMap(row => row.sourcePaths). That lets the source-safety rehearsal pass while the local interfaces it claims to validate contain the very disclosures the artifact is supposed to catch.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
Validation