Skip to content

V45 Gate 10: Formal Specification Consolidation#213

Merged
geraldarthurdavis merged 1 commit into
version/v45from
v45/gate-10-formal-spec-consolidation
May 31, 2026
Merged

V45 Gate 10: Formal Specification Consolidation#213
geraldarthurdavis merged 1 commit into
version/v45from
v45/gate-10-formal-spec-consolidation

Conversation

@geraldarthurdavis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • create the formal V45 draft specification family from accepted notes atoms
  • add V45 delta and parity shell so the next gate can audit implementation against formal spec rather than loose notes
  • update V45 notes companion status and add a Gate 10 checker that runs the V45 draft spec-family validator while keeping BITCODE_SPEC.txt on V44

Validation

  • pnpm run check:v45-gate10
  • pnpm run check:v45-gate9
  • pnpm run check:v45-gate8
  • pnpm run check:v45-gate7
  • pnpm run check:v45-gate6
  • pnpm run check:v45-gate5
  • pnpm run check:v45-gate4
  • pnpm run check:v45-gate3
  • pnpm run check:v45-gate2
  • node scripts/check-bitcode-spec-family.mjs --version V45 --mode draft --current-target V44
  • node scripts/check-bitcode-spec-family.mjs --version V44 --mode promoted --current-target V44
  • node scripts/check-bitcode-canon-posture-drift.mjs --active-canon V44 --draft-target V45
  • git diff --check

Create the formal V45 draft specification family from accepted notes atoms while preserving V44 as the active canonical pointer.

Add V45 spec, delta, parity shell, notes companion status updates, and the formal-spec consolidation checker with draft spec-family validation.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented May 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
engi-uapi Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 31, 2026 10:43pm

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cf1cc82034

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread BITCODE_SPEC_V45.md
Comment on lines +774 to +776
are missing. The draft generated artifacts are `.bitcode/v45-spec-family-report.json`
and `.bitcode/v45-canonical-input-report.json`; promotion later renders
`BITCODE_SPEC_V45_PROVEN.md`.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Generate the draft V45 artifact reports

This formal spec now declares .bitcode/v45-spec-family-report.json and .bitcode/v45-canonical-input-report.json as the draft generated artifacts, but this commit neither adds those files nor makes check:v45-gate10 generate or require them; find .bitcode -name 'v45*' is empty while older promoted families do commit their corresponding reports. When the next parity/promotion gate relies on the V45 generated roots promised here, the spec family will have no auditable artifact readback to validate against, so either the reports should be generated/checked in this gate or the spec should keep them explicitly future/pending.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@geraldarthurdavis
geraldarthurdavis merged commit 2200f71 into version/v45 May 31, 2026
28 checks passed
@geraldarthurdavis
geraldarthurdavis deleted the v45/gate-10-formal-spec-consolidation branch May 31, 2026 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant