V45 Gate 6: Spec Consolidation Sequencing#209
Conversation
Formalizes the V45 process order: notes-level specification atoms, formal V45 spec-family consolidation, implementation parity audit, then grouped implementation closure. Adds the focused check:v45-gate6 validation script while preserving V44 as the active canon pointer and updates the prior atom check to follow the refined parity wording.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3cf5cbe2af
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| "check:v45-gate3": "node scripts/check-v45-gate3-assetpack-lifecycle-state-machine.mjs", | ||
| "check:v45-gate4": "node scripts/check-v45-gate4-btd-scalar-volume-state-machine.mjs", | ||
| "check:v45-gate5": "node scripts/check-v45-gate5-btc-settlement-state-machine.mjs", | ||
| "check:v45-gate6": "node scripts/check-v45-gate6-spec-consolidation-sequencing.mjs", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This adds the V45 Gate 6 checker as a package script, but it is not invoked by the maintained workflows: with BITCODE_SPEC.txt still V44, .github/workflows/bitcode-gate-quality.yml only runs the V44 spec/promoted checks and check-v44-gate10 in its V44 branch (I inspected the workflow around lines 524-528, and the canon-quality workflow has the same V44-only block). As a result a V45 Gate 6 PR can merge green even if this new sequencing checker fails or the notes drift, which defeats the gate-closure validation this script is meant to enforce.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
Validation