Skip to content

🧪 Add tests for LogPath in config package#9

Open
adcondev wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
jules/test-logpath-config-648040783870750772
Open

🧪 Add tests for LogPath in config package#9
adcondev wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
jules/test-logpath-config-648040783870750772

Conversation

@adcondev
Copy link
Owner

  • 🎯 What: The testing gap addressed: Added missing unit tests for the LogPath function in the config package.
  • 📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested: Standard path, empty program data, trailing separators, and service names with spaces.
  • Result: The improvement in test coverage: Verified correct path joining behavior using filepath.Join cross-platform logic.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 648040783870750772 started by @adcondev

Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 19, 2026 20:24
@github-actions
Copy link

⚡ Benchmark Results

⚠️ No benchmarks found in the current codebase.

To add benchmarks, create functions starting with Benchmark in *_test.go files.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds unit test coverage for Environment.LogPath in the internal/config package to validate path joining behavior across several input scenarios.

Changes:

  • Introduces table-driven tests for Environment.LogPath.
  • Covers standard paths, empty programData, trailing separators, and service names containing spaces.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +41 to +45
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
e := Environment{
ServiceName: tt.serviceName,
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 19, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The subtest closure captures the loop variable tt. This pattern is flagged by govet/loopclosure (and can become a real bug if t.Parallel() is added). Rebind within the loop (e.g., tt := tt) or pass tt as an argument to the closure.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +16 to +20
name: "Standard path",
serviceName: "TestService",
programData: "/var/lib",
want: filepath.Join("/var/lib", "TestService", "TestService.log"),
},
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 19, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This table test repeats several string literals (e.g., "TestService", "/var/lib", "TestService.log") across cases. With goconst enabled in .golangci.yml, this may trigger lint failures; consider extracting shared values into local const/var declarations to keep the test linter-clean and easier to maintain.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants