[Docs] Audit task lifecycle verification gaps - #1626
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited based on label configuration. 🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Review statusThis PR was opened by an automated account. A human maintainer must verify the change intent, provenance, and validation before merging. Current step: Mark the PR ready. Required CI must pass before CodeRabbit starts. Review-state labels are managed by this workflow; do not edit them manually. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
|
Reconciled #1626 with #1623 and runtime-fix PR #1625 in commit |
|
Completed the lifecycle coverage audit in commit |
|
Completed the live-state traceability re-audit in commit |
|
Re-scoped #1626 to documentation/formal-model audit only at |
What changed
docs/architecture.Why this change was made
A green bounded checker can validate a premise, proxy, or abstract state space without proving the corresponding production behavior. The tracker now makes those distinctions explicit and prevents open runtime obligations from being described as covered or closed merely because a model command passes.
Impact
There is no production or UI behavior change. Contributors get an explicit formal-verification gap inventory and objective criteria for promoting each gap to production-backed coverage. Runtime fixes, shared types, scheduler behavior, and Zoo-Code-Docs are intentionally outside this PR.
Related PRs