Skip to content

[Chore] Record historical conversation workspace mismatch - #1601

Draft
zoomote[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test/worktree-conversation-repro-2ye35shr7kjgs
Draft

[Chore] Record historical conversation workspace mismatch#1601
zoomote[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test/worktree-conversation-repro-2ye35shr7kjgs

Conversation

@zoomote

@zoomote zoomote Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

​Created by Roomote. Follow up by mentioning @roomote, in the web UI, or in Discord.

What changed

Added a focused expected-failure test reproducing the historical-conversation workspace mismatch. The test opens the provider in one workspace, restores a conversation bound to another worktree, and asserts that file mention search should follow the open workspace.

Why this change was made

The mismatch is currently reproducible but lacked a durable automated signal. Using Vitest's expected-failure form documents the desired behavior without changing product logic or blessing the existing binding as correct.

Impact

There is no product behavior change. The suite now records one expected failure that can be converted to a normal regression test when conversation workspace switching is implemented.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (1)
  • coderabbit-review-active

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: d1835aaa-2343-41c6-9aa7-3af72559615a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review status

This PR was opened by an automated account. A human maintainer must verify the change intent, provenance, and validation before merging.

Current step: Mark the PR ready. Required CI must pass before CodeRabbit starts.

Review-state labels are managed by this workflow; do not edit them manually.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant