Skip to content

Track work in GitHub issues instead of REVIEW-ISSUES.md - #290

Merged
LunaUrsa merged 1 commit into
uatfrom
docs/move-tracker-to-issues
Nov 8, 2026
Merged

LunaUrsa merged 1 commit into
uatfrom
docs/move-tracker-to-issues

Conversation

@LunaUrsa

@LunaUrsa LunaUrsa commented Nov 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Moves issue tracking from REVIEW-ISSUES.md to GitHub issues.

#265 and #266 had both merged before this branch was cut, so their edits to REVIEW-ISSUES.md are included and no conflict arises. #266's follow-up (UAT compose build.args) is recorded in #275.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation
  • Refactor / chore
  • Other (describe above)

Checklist

  • Branch is up to date with uat (this PR targets uat, not main)
  • Lint passes (npx eslint .): checked the one changed source file, a comment-only edit
  • npx next build succeeds locally (also type-checks): not run; no code changes beyond a comment
  • No secrets, .env values, or user data included

Test plan

  • npx prettier --check CONTRIBUTING.md: passes.
  • npx eslint src/app/not-found.tsx: passes.
  • git grep REVIEW-ISSUES: no references left.
  • Checked labels on all 52 open issues with gh issue list.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The open entries in REVIEW-ISSUES.md are now issues #267-#289, labelled
by priority, type, status and area. CONTRIBUTING.md explains how to find,
claim and link issues and what the labels mean; the overlap groups became
Area: labels. The issue templates apply Type: and Status: Pending labels
so new issues land in triage.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@LunaUrsa
LunaUrsa merged commit 790701c into uat Nov 8, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant