-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
Mob hamburger menu #649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
funbunch
wants to merge
5
commits into
Together-100Devs:main
Choose a base branch
from
funbunch:mob-hamburger-menu
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Mob hamburger menu #649
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e641697
feat: add mobile hamburger menu
funbunch 3963e4a
Merge branch 'Together-100Devs:main' into mob-hamburger-menu
funbunch ee0d9cb
chore: trigger CI
funbunch 290d12f
chore: fix formatting (prettier)
funbunch d3302a8
chore: fix formatting CRLF (prettier)
funbunch File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we're specifying
linksas a prop now, could we send thedefaultLinksat the parent level? My 2 cents is that theHamburgerNavshould only display the links as passed, and not worry about the logic for determining what they should be.Something like
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe I had something like that before, but I wasn't getting it to work. My limited understanding, I'm sure. So kept it what seemed easiest in HamburgerNav.
I'm open though, and interested in what any other reviewers think!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
checking in again on this @funbunch. Did you want to implement this change or not? I think it's fine to merge for now, then we could make a separate issue for this refactor if we want to.
@geraldiner i think that @funbunch wasn't clear on how to implement this. if you have capacity could you help, otherwise we will merge it as is.
thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So sorry it's been a while and even I forgot the context of my own comment. 😅
I'd say merge as-is for now. There might be some other things to refactor for the component and don't want to slow this PR down.