Skip to content

Allow truthful unavailable model provenance in builder journals - #133

Merged
erinepshovel-code merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/model-provenance-unavailable
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

erinepshovel-code merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/model-provenance-unavailable

Conversation

@erinepshovel-code

@erinepshovel-code erinepshovel-code commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change

Keep website-builder-journal as the authoritative contract: record the exact executing model when exposed, otherwise model: unavailable with a nonempty model_unavailable_reason. Separate optional requested/configured alias from actual response model. Preserve identity-dependent scientific/model-comparison evidence gates and append-only history.

Update discovery summaries, contract regressions, the journal-only narrative preservation fixture, and deterministic generated adapter/native collection. No runtime, security, or deployment changes. skill-build and WDLL inspected; their doctrine needs no change.

Verification

Independent initial review: no remaining contract findings. 19 focused journal/WDLL/narrative tests pass. Native collection strict drift (CI Python 3.13), TypeScript, skill drift/compliance, adapter drift, ratios, llms drift, gonol authority, RepoLOTO audit and 7 checks pass.
Local full-suite comparison: 127 identical failures/errors on base and candidate, predominantly fail-closed Git visibility because the sandbox supplies an inaccessible synthetic /tmp/.git marker. Baseline also fails Python-version collection replay. Candidate initially had one stale journal-example preservation fixture; fixed and covered in the 19 passing focused tests. Initial CI collection drift from using default Python 3.12 was corrected by regenerating with CI's 3.13. Exact final-head CI remains required before merge.

Consumer

The-Interdependency.github.io consumes this contract in the coordinated Bastet transaction; its enforcement and public rendering are tested separately. Producer base: 83aef78. Consumer base: c955f2f9c36e69a68b8d3a7e0acb70e8fca6c36b. No semantic/scientific authority transfers through this publication relation.

@erinepshovel-code
erinepshovel-code marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2026 00:25
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-20T00:26:08.081044Z e53eae4 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@erinepshovel-code
erinepshovel-code merged commit e46accf into main Oct 20, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant