[erinepshovel-code]

The site repeats orientation and entry prompts, loads map/status assets on unrelated pages, and attaches overlapping export toolbars to Way units. At 320px the Way overflowed; its 20 units had 180 export buttons.

This changes the owning website surfaces: one guide at /about-the-site/, a shared compact footer, a compatibility redirect from /start/, route-specific assets, and exports on reading/source fields rather than their parent containers. The Way fits at 320px with 120 remaining export buttons. Ordinary reading pages omit six asset references (40,792 uncompressed source bytes, not a latency claim).

/by-the-builder/ publishes one dated, attributed AI-builder entry. The history guard rejects changes, removals, reordering, bad metadata, or invented correction targets; corrections append new records. PR/push checks bind prior Git history and fail when it is missing. This is a release policy, not administrator-proof storage.

File plan:

• src/_includes, src/home, src/start, CSS/JS: consolidate navigation, guide ownership and resources; preserve all source bodies. Risk: route/UI regression; checked with generated links and browser suite.
• src/about-the-site, src/by-the-builder, src/_data/builder.json, src/accessibility: public guidance, attributed history and honest scope. Risk: overclaiming; linked primary guidance and explicit limits.
• scripts/check-builder-history.mjs, journal tests, package/workflows: append-only gate with full checkout history. Risk: missing baseline; fail closed and test actual temporary Git history.
• docs/site-audit-2026-09-17.md and README: findings, authority record, measurements and usage.

Verification: 13 source/journal tests, 14 generated checks, 2,884 internal references across 126 HTML pages, static budgets, and 43 browser/accessibility checks passed locally. Local browser was available Chromium 139 because downloading the locked build failed; CI must independently run its declared browser. Full release checks required before merge. Manual assistive-technology/user testing and real-user Web Vitals remain hmmm.

Guidance: current skill-lib and METAPAT, W3C WAI, GOV.UK progressive enhancement, and web.dev; source bodies, licenses and claim authority remain unchanged.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-17T10:05:28.416556Z	a53669d	New commits

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.